Does anyone really care that Ellen DeGeneres was crying on her show over her dog!
Question: I mean seriously can't the media find anything more important? besides i wouldn't be suprised that it's nothing more than a publicity stunt anyway just to get people to feel sorry for her & watch her show.
Answers: I mean seriously can't the media find anything more important? besides i wouldn't be suprised that it's nothing more than a publicity stunt anyway just to get people to feel sorry for her & watch her show.
I don't care at all. I wish the media could find something to report except who's in rehab or who is screwing who.
i dont feel bad for her
she didnt even have that dog for a long time
If something bad happened to me personally and I had a public forum such as a talk show to air my grievances, hell yes I would.
Besides, the reason she was so upset was not that she no longer had the dog, but that it was taken away from two children.
She is very concerned for the dog and for how upset those little girls probably are. I think it may have just happened prior to her going on. I can't imagine not using whatever forum I could to save a dog or a person that could not save themselves.
i dont.
She's an Emmy winner. I don't think she needs the publicity. Maybe it's a slow news day. What difference does it make? If you don't like her, don't watch the show. I love Ellen and her show! And I hope she gets the dog back, too!
i feel bad i mean shes a person too you might not like her but she is just being normal like the rest of us she just needed to let it out and that is just perfectly fine.
I feel sorry for anyone that hurts. I may not agree with her on some things. I dont watch her show. But apparently she has a heart.Which isnt a bad thing. If something happened to one of my pets I would be upset too......
At least she admitted she did wrong, and you can clearly tell she was hurt over the fact thoughs girls got the dog taken away, it's not like shes asking for sympathy on her part, shes worried about the dog and the 2 girls.
I've adopted all my animals from the shelter for the last 20 years and we all have to sign saying that if we don't keep the animal then we'll turn in back into the agency. It's to keep people from putting helpless animals into unsafe or unsuitable homes.
Why should she be exempt from the rules if she's a celebrity? It's for the animals' protection, to keep people from "dumping" unwanted pets on unsuitable homes. People who don't want an animal are often more interested in getting rid of their "problem" than insuring that the poor beast is truly getting a good home.
If the hairdresser and her kids want the dog, let them go down to the shelter and apply to adopt it themselves! If they really are fit and proper people to provide a suitable home, the agency will decide and not Ellen Degeneres.
I agree! How about some news about our soldiers other than the death toll? All the good things people are doing everyday to help those in need?? I personally could care less about all these "celebrities" who have a drug & alcohol problem.
I think it is an important story. Not because it happened to Ellen, or anyone else famous, but because it happened to "somebody". Ellen used her "media link" to share this issue with the general public, which I think is just fine. It brings up an important issue...if someone adopts a dog (or cat or whatever) and it does not work out, is it easier on the animal to go to another loving home or to go back to a shelter where it gets hardly any attention? I agree that the person adopting the dog in the first place should contact the shelter to tell them it isn't working for them, BUT if the person who adopted it has another loving family in mind the shelter should let the new loving family take they dog. The shelter people should NOT have ripped that dog out of his new home, they should have given the family with the two girls the option to adopt that dog on the spot. Isn't the shelter's job to find a loving home for this animal?