Did Jamie Lynn Spears' baby-daddy break the law?!
Question: I haven't been keeping up with this, but I think that her boyfriend is 19, and she is 16. As far as I know it, this is against the law. What are the implications of this? If he isn't charged with statutory, should all cases like this be dropped?
Answers: I haven't been keeping up with this, but I think that her boyfriend is 19, and she is 16. As far as I know it, this is against the law. What are the implications of this? If he isn't charged with statutory, should all cases like this be dropped?
He won't be charged with statutory rape! He can breathe a sign of relief.
According to DMV records, the Department of Motor Vehicles (and a family member) have confirmed that Jamie Lynn Spears' babydaddy is only 18 years old.
Casey Aldridge was born on April 29th, 1989.
Jamie Lynn was born on April 4th, 1991. That puts her at just under two years younger than him.
Now they can continue to have pre-marital teenage sex in peace!
Technically, he committed statutory rape.
I think that he should, and theat Jamie is an idiot for letting herself do that
techinicaly yes he did. he's 18 and had sex with a minor (someone under 16) and that (to the law) is considered rape and is against the law. he should go to jail right now.
No the law is 4 years maximum. There is only a 3 year difference, therefore he didn't break the law. At least that's the law in my state which is PA, here's a list of the laws per state:
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2003/olrdata/jud/r...
Where were the adults to stop this from happening? I mean, really? There shouldn't be any excuses for someone like her. 16 year olds are not adults. They don't always think. 18 is pretty young too. Someone should have been involved here.
you should know huh PYT... the MJ pic is crazy quite the creep.
Yes he did break the law. She is under 18, any contact of a sexual nature is considered to be statuatory rape. Her boyfriend should be arrested and thrown in jail.
yah
for raping
Yes. Statuatory rape is anyone over the age of 18 having sex with someone under the age of 18. He should legally be brought up on charges.
Exactly all cases like this should be dropped.
The laws regarding teen sex are some of the most ridiculous that can be seen.
Evidently they were made by someone with their head "where the moon doth shine".
While it works OK if you have a prosecutor that has some common sense, but if you get some idiot or moron prosecutor or judge, it can result in untold amounts of damage to all parties involved.
When will we ever learn?
Unless someone wants to press charges, and if it is true that she was emancipated at the age of 16 and living with her boyfriend, then no, it isn't rape.
The only way he can go to jail is if her parents file charges on him and I don't think they are going to do that.
She is old enough to make her own mistakes. Yeah, she's 16 but she know what she's doing. She know's right from wrong.
Jennifer u just go to hell
what does MJ have to do with this question!?!?!