What do you think of Miranda Cosmo?!
Question: carly from icarly
Answers: carly from icarly
I think shes a young talented actress, and very good singer as well. I think whenever she can, she should do a music album, that will be cool, she is beautiful for her age, she has good acting skills, shes very funny, and great at everything she does.
If you mean Miranda Cosgrove, then she's cool but a little weird.
This page contains the Peer review requests that are older than one month, have received no response in the last two weeks, are not signed, or did not follow the "How to use this page" principles in some way. If one of your requests has been moved here by mistake, please accept our apologies and copy it back to the main Peer review page with your signature (~~~~).
--------------------------------------...
Tikal the Echidna
1st peer review
I'm striving for featured article status, so what do you think can be done to improve the article? --71.105.12.115 04:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
I'd consider converting the refs to the WP:FN system (see also User:Cyde/Ref converter)
Note also that references should go directly after puncuation, and never should be preceded by a space
It might be an idea to reduce the resolution of Image:Tikalx.jpg.
FA will probably protest the short paragraphs in "personality"
Try to reduce multiple links to the same article. A given article should not be linked more than once.
While at it, you might want to adjust links that point to disambiguation pages (such as Archie)
Have you looked at Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles#Check_your_fiction? Itmight provide useful hints
Circeus 05:29, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks! I'll try to fix those problems. Are there any other suggestions? --71.105.10.216 18:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
This article is a bit list-weighty; in other words, some of the lists should be converted to prose (paragraph form). For example, see "Voice actresses".
There are a few sections that are too short and that should be either expanded or merged. For example, Voice actresses is/are a bit short.
Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links.
Can you make Image:Tikeyes.gif any larger? I can't read the caption there.
The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. For an article of this length, the lead should contain 2-3 paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
This article can use copyediting to ensure that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. For example,
Starting randomly at Personality , has tried to stop her father in amicable ways and have never once have->has
In the cartoon, Sonic X, first comma unnecessary
also acts similar to her game -> similarly
Constrastly to the game, however Contrastly isn't a word
and perhaps other copyediting fixes for grammar/spelling are needed.
Thanks, AndyZ t 23:42, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll try to fix it. Is there any other advice? --71.118.84.247 04:18, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Every paragraph should have a citation. --Hetar 05:47, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Now that would be a bit strict; every section should have a citation if possible, but every paragraph may be a bit extreme, depending upon the nature of the article. AndyZ t 19:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Actually, I saw a featured article have four references before (Tikal's article has five)...unless that's not a citation...Anyhow I put references in the right place, reduced multiple links in the same article, adjusted disambiguation pages, expanded sections, merged short sections, alphabetized categories, and copyedited. Unfortunately, I can't reduce the resolution of the Sonic X image or make the Sonic Pinball Party picture any larger. I'm sorry! But that won't stop it from becoming a featured article, would it? --71.104.188.113 05:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Bangladesh
This article has improved a lot in the last month, most notably with the inclusion of a lot of relevant images, very detailed references for almost all the facts quoted, and standard sections as per country pages. The language has also been NPOVized to a great extent. So, I think we can move this into FAC, but before that, I'd like to hear other people's opninions in avenues for improvement. Thanks. --Ragib 05:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
The cultural section needs a lot of work. Some of the prose is South Asian English, not English English, and some of the sentences are clumsy. Frex, "Contemporary Bangladesh keeps producing a substantial amount of litearture of all forms." That makes literature sound like the jute harvest. It would be better to say something about the number of newspapers, magazines, and books published, literacy, readership, and perhaps to mention the names of some well-known contemporary writers. Is there an article on Bengali literature?
The history section contains a lurid sentence which runs something like "Rape of Bangladesh was one of the worst genoicides in history, as bad as the genoicide in Cambodia" and there's a link to an emotional website. It was horrible, inexcusable, vile ... I hadn't realized that it was so terrible ... and I shudder to think that the perpetrators are still living at their ease. Still, it wasn't as bad as Cambodia, where Pol Pot managed to kill 25% of the population. The West Pakistanis didn't manage that in Bangladesh. Now perhaps "bad" is measured by population numbers, but that's a clumsy scale to use ... wiping out 100% of an Amazon tribe of 1000 people would seem "less bad" than killing 2000 people out of a population of 10,000,000. Perhaps you should leave out the judgements about more or less bad and just present the facts ... that's horrifying enough.
I'm sure that there are more nits to pick, but those were the biggest problems I saw. Zora 06:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
The article needs to be written in summary form and you would need to trim about ~5 kb of content.
Article needs a copyedit ( ->Does it still need it? we've tried to go through every error, so how is it now? --Ragib 03:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC))
Please don't compare the country with another (Greece). It needs to be a summary of the article. ( Done --Ragib 03:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC))
Remove the time magazine cover. It's not a free image. ( Done --Ragib 03:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC))
Merge politics with government. ( Done --Ragib 03:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC))
Please avoid squeezing text between two images.
The Education section can be removed
I'll review in detail after the article is summarised and copyedited. Regards, =Nichalp ?Talk?= 06:14, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Just something I noticed right away were three links in the middle of the history section that need to be converted into references or something. Looking at the page in the printable version makes the section look ugly with the URLs present in the paragraph as opposed to at the bottom like the references. Pepsidrinka 04:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Encyclopedic indeed
A page representing the highest wiki-tradition, a truly encyclopedic page, The page has all the ingredients to migrate to the status of a featured page. It is really heartening to note that as of now the page has no redlinks, as such the user shall have the luxury to dig deep into the contents covered in this page. I am re- reading the page very carefully, and shall surely come back with more comments, if required. --Bhadani 08:05, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment I think the "Education" section should stay. Also, given the quality of this article right now, it should be put up at FAC immediately, so that more critique would be available. Other than that, minor issues: "$" should be converted to "USD" or "US$", non-breaking spaces ( ? ) and – need to be used consistently. This looks great — good luck. Saravask 23:47, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Everything looks good except the subdivisions section. The problem is the main article links break up the prose and make for very short, choppy sentences. Consider merging that section with politics too. - Taxman 21:29, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Template
Hi - I've just created "BangladeshTopics." Please help to customize and improve it. Rama's Arrow 17:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
How about now?
How is the article right now? I've commented in bold replies to most of the points raised above, so please take a look and let me know. Thanks. --Ragib 03:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
I've made some major edits to the page including copyediting. A few red links are introduced, it should be made blue, 1 citation needed, and the highest point mentioned. I've removed the =Education= section as per the Wikiproject countries which does not list it. I've also merged =sports= under culture and pruned away victories over Pakistan etc. The only thing remaining is the =History= section. Up till this point in 1966, its president Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was jailed and in 1969 was released after unprecedented popular uprising. the section is well summarised, but after that it becomes too detailed. Regards, =Nichalp ?Talk?= 13:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC) ( citation and hig
Dont hate her, but Im not a "fan".
The show is ok when Im bored