Why is everyone so unfair towards Heather Mills?!


Question: Why all the sniping and bitchyness aimed at this young lady? Has she not suffered enough losing one leg? How can one be expected to live on £25m? And when the young lady only has access to three houses,don't you think it is a tremendous amount to bear? I am therefore starting the "Save Heather Campaign" to raise awareness and much more money to help this poor, unfortunate, moneygrabbing, evil, foul, nasty, slimy, demented old witch. I will not be offering her any more beef and onion soup. She is too fat.


Answers: Why all the sniping and bitchyness aimed at this young lady? Has she not suffered enough losing one leg? How can one be expected to live on £25m? And when the young lady only has access to three houses,don't you think it is a tremendous amount to bear? I am therefore starting the "Save Heather Campaign" to raise awareness and much more money to help this poor, unfortunate, moneygrabbing, evil, foul, nasty, slimy, demented old witch. I will not be offering her any more beef and onion soup. She is too fat.

your right i agree wit every word especially with the moneygrabbing part.

seems like you came to your senses at the end of your question!!she is a twat!!

Because people like paul mcCartney for everything he has done with the beatle's and with his solo career so if someone does something to him his fan's don't like they are going hate the person who did it.

Lol. I just hope that by the time Beatrice grows up though it has all blown over and she has a normal childhood. Poor mite with a mother like her!!

Nicely put. I think Paul should record Positively 4th Street in her honour.

I will second all these remarks.....the biggest and nastiest witch of all times. Time she got back to being a prostitute where she belongs....on the street...!

Because she's a crazy biiiitch.

She is absolute nuts that woman. At least Sir Paul has kept his dignity & remained private during the whole sham. Poor guy had to live with her arghhhh!

Sooooo....are you feeling sorry for her? or do you think that she is a gold digger like everyone else? it is hard to tell, but i sense some sarcasm there....but to answer your question, everyone hates her because they think that she is a money grubbing gold digger...and basically i tend to agree, why drag the freaking court processes out for so long...just to get more money that YOU didn't earn.

She is a sandwich short if a picnic. I only hope that Bea their daughter comes out of this relatively unscathed. It's always the innocent that suffer.

Just think of all the money she saves on shaving foam aswell...

The judge in the Paul McCartney-Heather Mills divorce case found Mills’ behavior "distinctively distasteful" in his final findings on Tuesday.

Indeed, Judge Bennett came very close to accusing Mills of trying to steal nearly $1 million from McCartney during their marriage.

The shocking recitation of Mills’ monetary malfeasance comes midway through his 58-page findings, beginning at No. 135 under "Wife’s Assets."

Bennett tells the story of an office McCartney gave to Mills during their short marriage called Thames Reach for $900,000 on May 17, 2004.

"That [office] property was purchased using funds from the NatWest savings account of the wife, which had been fed the husband’s gifts to the wife $500,000 in December 2002 and again in December 2003."

On Nov. 2, 2005 — a year and a half later — Mills e-mailed McCartney’s finance director and told him there was an outstanding mortgage of almost $1 million. She wrote: "Please pay it in the following account and I will deal with closure of it." The account was in her name at NatWest, Bennett says.

Three days later, Mills e-mailed the finance director again: "There are four loans totaling $990,000." When pressed for details of the loans, she failed to come up with them. That didn’t stop her. In February 2006, she twice e-mailed the finance director asking for the money to be put in her account. She was denied each time.

Two months later, Mills and McCartney separated. Mills sold McCartney the property for $1.2 million and purchased another property for $1.1 million. From the amounts involved, it would seem like she turned a small profit.

But the Thames Reach property remained a question in McCartney’s mind. Almost a year later, in Feb. 2007, in a divorce questionnaire, Bennett says Mills answered that she’d never had any loans at all.

Judge Bennett writes that McCartney’s lawyer "put to her that that was a fraudulent attempt to extract money from [McCartney]."

"In my judgement," Bennett writes, "it is unnecessary to go so far as to characterize what [Mills] attempted as fraudulent. However, it is not an episode that does her any credit whatsoever. Either she knew or she must have known that there were no loans on Thames Reach, yet she tried to suggest that there were and thereby obtain monies by underhanded means.

"In light of McCartney’s generosity towards her, I have set out, I find Mills’s behaviour distinctly distasteful. In any event…it damages her overall credibility."

That’s not all.

Bennett berated Mills for many things in his exhaustive decision. He seems to have "gotten" Mills more than anyone thought, coming close to calling her a gold-digger and liar.

At best were his many observations of her living as an earth mother who dispenses funds to charity and takes care of the world as "make believe." It’s clear from the time he spent listening to her that she is nothing short of a fabulist who imagines herself a great Lady with a capital L.

There are innumerable surprises as you pore through Bennett’s paper: That McCartney loaned money to both of Mills’ sisters so they could live in better homes is just the tip of the iceberg. You can see now why Stella McCartney was going crazy lobbying against her stepmother; she saw what her father, still grieving for his beloved Linda and trying to move on with his life, could not.

Bennett takes particular umbrage, though, with Mills’ behavior after the separation. He calls her out on using the media, baiting paparazzi but hating them at the same time. He does more than imply that it was her side that released sealed papers from the divorce to the press.

But more succinctly, he takes Mills to task for her post-separation spending. Bennett balances the thrifty Paul, who’s never led a particularly flashy life, with Heather’s ramped-up lifestyle.

"Her expenditure from October 2006 to December 2007 totaled $7.4 million made up as to $6 million in personal expenditure, $1.3 million business expenditure and $75,000 cash expenditure," Bennett writes. He concludes that it’s all out of control.

Bennett writes: "In my judgement, Mills’s attitude…is that she is entitled for the indefinite future, if not for the whole of her life, to live at the same 'rate' as McCartney and be kept in the style to which she perceives she was accustomed during the marriage. Although she strongly denied it her case boils down to the syndrome of 'me, too' or 'if he has it, I want it too.'"

He concludes: "It must have been absolutely plain to Mills after separation that it was wholly unrealistic to expect to go on living at the rate at which she perceived she was living."

its people like you who make this world a better place NOT she had her own money she was already famous the only reason any one has any issues with her is because Paul McCartney was a Beatle so his crap don't stink and all that. Every women that has ever married a Beatle has been treated like crap. Did you notice how she got less then 5% and 90% of that is in a trust fund for theyre daughter when she turns 18. So its seems that Paul McCartney is a evil control freak who cant keep a women he's already been divorced 3 times. There is obivously something wrong with HIM. I might love the Beatles but I sure don't love him.

It works out at appromimately £16,000 a night of her marriage not a bad nightly rate!!! However I do think it was foolish of him not to sign a prenuptial agreement.I think if she had behaved with a bit more decorum and taken her money and disappeared out the back door of the court people would have respected her a lot more but she is trying to destroy a British institution and we cant accept it. All of this nonsense about being a millionaire in her own right and the amount she donated to charity dont add up to what she paid in taxes according to our newspapers and tv so I am afraid I have lost my little respect I had for her. I have no idea where her future lies I just hope she plays things down now for her own and her daughters sake.

she wanted 125 milion punds got that rejected wanted 35,000 for wine that she dont even drink wine cos some one said that in the court, she wanted money for a horse-riding olympic thing she dont do that either, she was told not 2 say anythin in the court and she did shes been on every talk show 2 win over the public sayin how unfair its been and the fact she didnt want the money but how come she didnt want her expenses 2 come out 2 the public. she now has got 24.3 million and she isnt happy about it she should be grateful and not be such a greedy selfish gold diggin cow!!!!!!!!

The dude didnt make her sign a pre-nup, so he had it coming, hes lucky they didnt give her half!

People have loads of opinions and personally mine are that I wish people like her don't exist. I hate it when they use other people. She must of really hurt him.

DIDNT HE HEAR OF THE WORD PRE NUP?SHES A MONEY GRABBING VILE TROLL.

She may be all the things you all say and I agree BUT, what was wrong with Sir Paul, a man of his intelligence and power with all the educated lawyers and advisers at his disposal NOT GETTING CLUED UP ABOUT HER IN THE BEGINNING for goodness sake!!! !!!

I think she should pack up leave for America, she doesn't stand a chance in Britain anymore, she has totally lost her marbles and must be the most hated celeb in the country!

she is an evil hooker, and now she can get her grapple hook out again for some other sod with loads of money. Maybe he can buy her a spare leg?

LMAO, i'm with you all the way



The answer content post by the user, if contains the copyright content please contact us, we will immediately remove it.
Copyright © 2007 enter-qa.com -   Contact us

Entertainment Categories