Why aren't the pictures that Miley Cyrus took not considered child pornograp!
Question: Why aren't the pictures that Miley Cyrus took not considered child pornography!?
Answers:
I guess it is cause shes not fully covered up,
But Its because her show is one of the biggest Disney shows, around, So they are afraid to admit its Child Porn!. Cause they dont want to lose Hannah Montana, Cause its a really popular show -- So they would lose TONS!.
As much as I Love Hannah Montana, I hope Miley gets Fired cause she acts way to mature, and Shes being a terrible inspiration for those little 10 year olds who want to grow up to be just like her!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
But Its because her show is one of the biggest Disney shows, around, So they are afraid to admit its Child Porn!. Cause they dont want to lose Hannah Montana, Cause its a really popular show -- So they would lose TONS!.
As much as I Love Hannah Montana, I hope Miley gets Fired cause she acts way to mature, and Shes being a terrible inspiration for those little 10 year olds who want to grow up to be just like her!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
That picture cannot compare to the graphic and heartbreaking pictures of real child pornography!.
I studied this in my Human Sexuality class in college, and I saw some pictures that I cannot forget and wished that I had not seen!
Your question is an honest and innocent one---congratulations----you are not a perve!Www@Enter-QA@Com
I studied this in my Human Sexuality class in college, and I saw some pictures that I cannot forget and wished that I had not seen!
Your question is an honest and innocent one---congratulations----you are not a perve!Www@Enter-QA@Com
she isn't even completely naked dumbass!. it's only considered "child pornoghraphy" if he or she is fullly naked naring chest and ***(for woman) and the *** and anus(for men)!. do your research before you post dumb, half asked questions like this one!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
well in my opinion!.!.!.!.she was too young for that photoshoot!.!.!.but then again it WAS a photoshoot, with a magazine!. plus her dad was there, basically giving her permission to do so!. and yeah, she was covered up!. i personally think it was HER opinion!. i honestly don't really like her, but she can do what she wants!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
She isn't nude in the photos and they aren't intended to be pornography!. They are essentially no different to a photo of a child or adolescent on a beach or in a swimming pool!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
Because she's covered up, and because her parents were at the shoot & signed forms to release the pictures before they knew what they looked like!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
pornography is sexual fantasies associated with touching or having some kinda sexual intercourse
which it was just just a picture dudeWww@Enter-QA@Com
which it was just just a picture dudeWww@Enter-QA@Com
maybe not pornography, but inappropriate!. also i am not sure i like the photos with her father either!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
Because she is not naked, there are so many pictures out there that are ten times worse than those that no one talks about!. GET OVER IT!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
because she is making that stupid excsue its not what she wanted and she started like crying and saying she is embarrassed
she knew exactly what she was doing
just a stupid excuseWww@Enter-QA@Com
she knew exactly what she was doing
just a stupid excuseWww@Enter-QA@Com
oh boy, first she'd have to have no clothes on, then you can debate whether it is pornograghicWww@Enter-QA@Com
Because she isn't showing anything although it is suggestive!.!.!.I think they tried to give her a more mature look way too fast!.!.!.I'm mean she like still works for Disney for crying out loudWww@Enter-QA@Com
because there is no aspect of pornography to them!. in case you havent noticed YOU CANT SEE ANYTHING! get over it!Www@Enter-QA@Com
Because they aren't pornographic!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
cuz it dosen't show her "area" or boobs!. but that picture is gross!. they made a CHILD pose topless! that's wrong on sooo many levels!!!Www@Enter-QA@Com
ur question has a double negative so i dont understand
it but i
know that miley sucks and is a sluttWww@Enter-QA@Com
it but i
know that miley sucks and is a sluttWww@Enter-QA@Com
She did it to prolong her fifteen minutes!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
Wearing jeans and covered up!. Sorry, haters; she is not the next Britney Spears!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
Because she has clothes on!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
cause all you see was her BACKBONE, jeez!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
she isnt fully naked, plus, shes covered upWww@Enter-QA@Com
Thank you! I agree!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
cuz her dad ws there and shes covered upWww@Enter-QA@Com
umm cause her back is showing!.!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
because she isn't fully naked, and she still has some clothes onWww@Enter-QA@Com
cuase u can;t c nothin!.!.!.xcept fur her bare back!.!.!.!.!.nothing porny!.!.!.there!.!.!.!.or nudyWww@Enter-QA@Com