Should paparazzi activity be limited?!
Question: Should paparazzi activity be limited!?
Even though celebrities are public people, shouldn't they have rights too!? They shouldn't have to worry about their kid being scared by a shutterbug popping out of the bushes, they shouldn't have to worry about naked shots of them that they didn't legitimately pose for ending up in Penthouse or Playgirl(depending on the sex of the subject in question)!. Celebrity shouldn't mean you give up your rights, or else why would anyone become one!? To me, the money and the exposure(so to speak) wouldn't be incentives!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
Answers:
Yes it should be limited!. My stepson has been a paparazzi for 20 years!. He now has three websites and a radio show!. He told me back in the day,it was not like it is now!. If something isn't done,someone is going to get seriously injured or worse!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
But to a shallow person, money and exposure are great incentives!. They are blinded by the fact that they would be rich and be known everywhere - and forget all about the complete loss of privacy (and then eventually dignity) when you become a big celebrity!. Mistakes that everyone makes daily are suddenly blown up to impossible proportions if you're a celebrity!. It's sickening!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
noWww@Enter-QA@Com