Do you think the Jonas Brothers are an embarresment to rock?!


Question: Do you think the Jonas Brothers are an embarresment to rock!?
They were on the cover of rolling stones magazine, a ROCK magazine!. What do you think!?Www@Enter-QA@Com


Answers:
Rolling Stone magazine has no credibility!.
They're now just a regular, no one cares anymore, magazine!.

But no, They're not a legit rock band which means they're not rock!. So what's there to be embarrassed about!?
Www@Enter-QA@Com

I think the cover of the magazine that they did was great, (but joe hogged like all of the cover!.!.), But I think they belong in the pop industry and they're too young and disneyesh to do rock stuff, I still really like them though, and I thought rolling stone magazine puts all popular celebs on their cover!? They put Ashton Kutcher, Britney Spears and all sorts of other actors/ actresses and musiciansWww@Enter-QA@Com

Ya there not rock a band, and I don't know why they call they're self a rock band like my follow friend said they're pop !
I don't know if they're embarresment to rock but they do embarres me they wear tight pants and say its rock style !! :S its gay and all my friends say they look so gay in those pants !!!!
Www@Enter-QA@Com

I actually think they're helping in a way, there image is not as heavy as a traditional rocker, thus more younger kids are interested and parents are more at ease, they're like Souljah boy, the music is like training wheels for the real stuff!.!.!. so really they draws a wider range of people to the genre!.!.!. my logicWww@Enter-QA@Com

no, they are pop/rock!.!.!.im a huge rock fan and metalhead!.!.!.and i think they fit in that category :]]]]]] they are still young!.!.!.not like papa rock or killswitch engage, so they deserve to be in the mag!.!.!.why is every1 against them!?!?!?!?!? They're young!.!.!.probably they'll get more in the rocker scene when they get older [Kevin's 20, Joe's 19, and Nick's 15]Www@Enter-QA@Com

They Are POP/ROCK!. Listen to this song and tell me it isnt rockish, Kum on tell me, THATS RIGHT< YA CANT CUZ IT IS Rockin!. Listen, http://uk!.youtube!.com/watch!?v=QdmTN2Juc_!.!.!. AND LISTEN TO THE WHOLE THING! It Starts The Real Rock Part At About 1:56,Www@Enter-QA@Com

Since I don't even consider them rock I guess I'm not embarrassed!. Now I DO consider them an embarrassment to RS magazine!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

i dont think they are an embarrassment because they arent rock!.

rolling stone has been going downhill for years!. they just want a younger audience!.!.!. they dont give a **** about music anymore!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

They are an embarrassment to music in general!. They are NOT rock!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

There have been other artists on the cover that were not rock, but pop!. They were not the first!.

ie: Britney Spears was on the cover
She was on twice, actually!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

YYYEEESSS!!!!!!Www@Enter-QA@Com

Well, they had Britney on the cover!.!.!.
To me, it's more that RS has lost all rock credibility!.

Www@Enter-QA@Com

yes i do, they are NOT rock
they are pop, along with Busted and McFly!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

No!.
But they're pop!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

yes,because they ARE NOT rock!.They are pop!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

Yes they are!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

yessssWww@Enter-QA@Com

no never i love them!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

*gasppp*!

i thinkz we're da greatezt rockk bandd evarz so whateverz loozer!Www@Enter-QA@Com



The answer content post by the user, if contains the copyright content please contact us, we will immediately remove it.
Copyright © 2007 enter-qa.com -   Contact us

Entertainment Categories