Jonathan Ross led the vulgar talk and ruined Russell's show, so why's he!


Question: Jonathan Ross led the vulgar talk and ruined Russell's show, so why's he still in a contract!? !?
I used to like Russell Brand's show and I'm angry that Jonathan Ross went on to ruin it!. Ross started all the vulgar talk!. Ross is supposed to be experienced with radio and TV and Russell probably respects him!. I always thought Ross was a pratt as when he first started he had to wear suits that got himself attention to make up for his lack of personality!. All he does now is go on about his wife (who is that woman with the stupid red hair) and and his kids!. Or he makes vulgar comments to his guests, then puts his hands up to the audience to say, what!? He talks about himself more than listening to his guests!. I can't believe the BBC thought he was worth six million a year!. Brand has shown that he's more mature and admits there was a mistake!. I think Brand should come back and Ross should go!. It's a bad example to society when the person who doesn't admit their mistake still keeps their contract!. If Johnathan Ross is always bragging about being a family man, as does nothing but go on about his wife and kids, then why did he lead the vulgar conversation and use all the F words!? I would be embarrassed if my dad did that!. Www@Enter-QA@Com


Answers:
Totally agree with you!. The little twit has been over-blown as an 'entertainer', has an over-blown sense of himself and an absurdly over-blown salary!.
I used to watch his chat show solely for the guests but he constantly dragged the conversation down to his puerile, school playground level and his conceit has become irritating in the extreme!. He does not attract large audiences - I understand Friday Night is less than Top Gear so I think it's right his future is debated further!.
A spineless and similarly overpaid DG is hoping the twit will reappear in 3 months when the fuss has died down but many of us will do what we can to prevent it!. At least Brand and the Controller behaved honourably but Woss is too full of himself to do likewise!.
Only a cretin would insult the audience with "Shall I bring my next guest out !?" - we deserve better than such drivel!. Www@Enter-QA@Com

ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!


By the way, don’t invite people to respond to your question if you are going to insult them by suggesting that they are gullible for falling for BBC spin!

There is simply more interesting things to talk about!Www@Enter-QA@Com

I cant believe people are still talking about this!. Jonathan ross brings in big audiences everytime hes on, that's the reasonWww@Enter-QA@Com

Russell Brand is a no-good unfunny piece of crap!.!.!.!.you guys can KEEP him!. Just dont let him slime his way back over to America!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.and NO!.I am NOT a fan of the Jonas Sisters!.Www@Enter-QA@Com

Who cares!?Www@Enter-QA@Com

I think Jonathan Ross is funny!. Www@Enter-QA@Com

I quite agree with you and he certainly is not worth the money he gets, all of it our license money!!Www@Enter-QA@Com

I believe they tried to outdo each other during the programme and were equally to blame!.!. They were both on a 'high' and it makes one wonder whether they had taken 'something' beforehand to be in such an outrageous mood!. Ross is brilliant at setting the right level of filth in his shows for he appreciates quite accurately how his interviewees will react!. Some participants do not swear and keep their cool whilst others are just as bad as him!. I admit he is funny until he exceeds the parameters of reasonable decency!. Www@Enter-QA@Com

The only way i can answer this is by talking out of the equation the question of him being guilty or not of misconduct, abusive calls!. (or whatever you want to call it)
The BBC has decided he IS at fault and so we'll go with that for the purposes of this subject!.

The BBC has no guts, if this was a tv personality that was of a lower 'rank' he would have gone without a doubt but to stop his shows for a couple of months and fine him an amount where they pay him more than ten times that is meaningless!.

If a criminals sentance is based on the crime he has comitted, should it be massively reduced because of how much use he is to society!?

The BBC is worried about losing him to another company, they are worried about viewing figures but if he's guilty as charged (as they have found him) then he should be punished the same as everyone else!.

Personally (as a licence payer) i think Jonothan Ross is a reasonable presenter but know where near the level the Beeb seem to put him!.
He doesn't represent anywhere near good value for OUR money and i don't think his loss to ITV or C4 would dent the viewing figures that much anyway!.

Www@Enter-QA@Com

I believe they were both equally responsible!.

However,the BBC recognise Ross as a seasoned professional and Brand as a talentless flash in the pan shock jock!.Since this episode the BBC will be forced to show some restraint!.So what will there be for Brand to do!?He doesn't do anything else other than vulgarity!.

Dont get me wrong,I wouldn't listen to Johnathon Ross either but he is poles apart from Brand!.Good riddance to bad rubbish!.
Www@Enter-QA@Com



The answer content post by the user, if contains the copyright content please contact us, we will immediately remove it.
Copyright © 2007 enter-qa.com -   Contact us

Entertainment Categories