Naruto has killed a 10 year old. *Vid Inside*?!


Question: Naruto has killed a 10 year old kid Named Codey Porter. He trying to act like a guy named gaara and burried himself alive in a sandbox. The Family is filing a lawsuit against Cartoon Network to try to put it off the air.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCHv9txhV...

Now are u Naruto Fans happy. That a 10 year old has died at your hands. you guys should be ashamed of yourselfs.

In the Lawsuit it states that it must be cancelled by 7/22/08.


Answers: Naruto has killed a 10 year old kid Named Codey Porter. He trying to act like a guy named gaara and burried himself alive in a sandbox. The Family is filing a lawsuit against Cartoon Network to try to put it off the air.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCHv9txhV...

Now are u Naruto Fans happy. That a 10 year old has died at your hands. you guys should be ashamed of yourselfs.

In the Lawsuit it states that it must be cancelled by 7/22/08.

someone tried to do desert coffin
and he really got owned

I swear, I've heard this one before. Seriously.

TT.TT

IT'S NOT THE ANIME TO BLAME!

And we American's sue everything; you can't deny that.

-------------------------It. Was. An. Accident.

I feel really sorry for the family. I would just die if my own little brother died. But I don't think it's right to blame the anime. The kid could've been copying an ostrich, for heaven's sake! Ostriches stick their heads into sand in tons of stuff on tv! The parent's should've been watching him closer, and sadly, this was the outcome when they didn't.

-------------------------

"Now are u Naruto Fans happy. That a 10 year old has died at your hands. you guys should be ashamed of yourselfs."

Look who's talking. That's absolutely =sick= that someone would use the excuse of the death of a child, a human being, just to flame and bash others. What if the parents and friends of that kid Cody Porter saw this? What if one of them was an anime fan? Do you know how deep that would hurt them? If you've ever lost someone close to you.... Then you know it hurts.

LOL thats retarded they cant blame naruto for that. If I go jump off a building because I wanna fly like superman and die, I cant sue the DC comics. I cant help but laugh at this post.

Yeah that's real mature. Blame a cartoon for the death of a child. It's no different than saying that Video Games are deadly.

Don't get me wrong, I'm sorry the kid died, that's not okay at all, but in reality, what is a lawsuit going to do? It's not going to bring the kid back to life.

The parents should have been watching them. That's what would have saved him. And suing the company is not going to work.

In fact, under normal circumstances, a child cannot learn anything from passive media (TV, movies, radio, books, etc.). What passive media can do is reinforce concepts already planted in the child's mind. What this means is, if mom and dad and aunts, uncles, grandparents and siblings are teaching the child things, they will accept the primacy of those sources over TV no matter what the TV tells them. That's why cartoons generally aren't harmful to children even though they're filled with complete nonsense and mayhem: if the family has been doing its job of teaching the child they'll understand how silly those cartoon physics are. That's what's supposed to produce the laughter: the disparity of cartoon reality from reality.

Now, where passive media can teach a child something is if that child is a void medium. What I mean is, if mom and dad (and brother, sister, auntie, uncle, grandma, grandpa, etc.) don't teach a child anything, the child will not have a more primary source of information than the passive media in which they are engaged. This is increasingly a problem for several reasons: for one, for the first time in the history of the civilized world, both parents are likely to have careers, meaning the child is more likely than ever to spend more time with the passive media than his own parents. For another, we are at a historical low for fertility rates in the west, meaning children are more likely than ever to be only children and therefore have no brothers or sisters and, for that matter, aunts and uncles. For yet another, divorce rates are at a historic high in the west as well, and increasingly these divorces are occurring in longstanding relationships (20+ years) which is another historical first, so grandma and grandpa might not even be around. And even if a child is lucky enough to have a largely intact extended family, due to modern conveniences of mobility and modern reconception of the family (grandma and grandpa are less likely to move in with the family late in life, extended families are less likely to spend more than five or six days a year together) the child is unlikely to have any meaningful contact with his now-distant relatives.

Add into this a continuing distrust of strangers that means that kids have fewer friends and many fewer trusted adults from outside the family than in hundreds of years despite massive innovations in both child safety and communication, and it's a testament to the strength of natural human ingenuity that more kids don't do stupid things they saw on TV.

There is, of course, one oft-advocated replacement for all of these things: school. While it is true that kids consider school a more primary source than passive media (and always will no matter how little they respect it; school actually forces them to interact with their instructors in most cases, especially elementary schools [with which we are primarily concerned]) schools are also becoming less and less interactive and demanding less and less discipline and respect from their students, meaning their strength as a primary source gets diluted more with each passing year. In addition, schools can teach information but they should not teach values. In a free society, the decision of which values to tech rest with the family. Otherwise, which values should schools teach? Parents have a hard enough time arguing out what to teach the kids. Societies certainly won't be able to agree on what should be taught to everyone's child.

And of course the real reason not to have schools replace families as the teacher of values: do you really want your kids to be raised by the state? Should congress decide what's important for your kids to learn? If you plan on having kids some day and you don't like the president or congress right now (and the numbers say you almost certainly don't if you're on a message board right now) it should be food for thought.

Naruto is getting canceled!!? OMGG!

*puts serious face on now*

It doesn't matter much you can still watch it online and anyway, i don't watch the english dubs.

About the kid who was killed, I feel very sorry for the family. But, you have to admit a ten year old should be smart enough to not do things like this.

The whole thing about the family filing a lawsuit against cartoon network is a bit extreme I think.

I don't think that this is the T.V. show's fault at all. The kid could have just as well saved someone because of what he saw in Naruto.

Besides, it's the parents' job to make sure their child understands the difference between reality and fantasy, and that they know not to reinact what they see on the show, whether it's heroic or just out of curiosity.

im a huge naruto fan, and
American sue every ****** thing!! its the dumb kids fault!! and his parents for not watching over the kid!!

we alredy have tons of sex and violence TV shows, but what do they do about it..NOTHING!! and theyre suing a cartoon show?! how pathetic!! I guess americans rather have their daughters coming home pregnant & gangs on the streets.
jeez!

Oh shut up. First of all, the parents should'nt even be letting a ten year old watch Naruto. Second of all, it's not our fault the kid buried himself, although I do feel sorrowful for him and his family.

First off all, i am SICK of this!!

well then that means a lot of things should be cancelled if thats what they are implying.

warcraft ( the pc game) should be cancelled,
even pirates of the carribbean killed a kid aswell, but theystill did the third movie.
o but we musnt forget how pokemon put children in a coma.

seriously how can a 10 a yr old be playing a sand box. when i was 10 i could distinguish reality and cartoons.

dont blame the animation, for F'ks Sake!
i feel bad the kid died but still... seriously... they make it seem like its only naruto thats killed a kid.

Its their fault for letting him watch it.its his fault for being so stupid to acaualy do it.so there should be no blame on the show.dam that family is full of idiots

What the hell is wrong with the world?

Please, can some one tell me? Because this makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

For starters, what 10-year-old in their right mind buries himself head-first in sand? That's the kind of behavior you'd expect from a 4-year-old or a mentally slow child. Hey, don't get me wrong, it's tragic that he died, but this incident was caused by idiocy. Didn't he try to get out when he couldn't breathe? Didn't his friends realize that he wasn't getting air? Weren't their warning senses going off when he wasn't moving, head-first in the sand until it was too late? What, did he just lay there un-moving, calmly accepting the fact that he couldn't breathe? If they were all really that stupid, then you can't blame anybody but them for his death.

And for the lawsuit? HAH! Please. What's that gonna do? So what if Naruto isn't on the air anymore? The new episodes still get updated weekly on Youtube, and are actually farther along than on air. And actually, most Naruto fans don't even watch the Anime; most prefer the manga. And the Manga/Anime is *everywhere* on the internet. No lawsuit is going to get rid of Naruto.

Why are they even filing a lawsuit against Cartoon Network? It's not the Network's fault the child is so stupid that he decides to copy whatever the hell he sees on TV. I actually think the parents -- who should have been watching the child in the first place -- should be charged with child endangerment and the kid's friends should be charged with murder.

It's no one but the kid, his parents, and his friend's fault that he died, so don't try to blame the Network.

And here's a question for you, poster: Why should Naruto fans be ashamed of ourselves? We like the show because it’s funny, dramatic, action-packed and fun to watch. It's not like we all got together and went "MUAHAHAHA. Let’s make up a character named Gaara of the Sand in some hope a small child might copy it and die! MUAHAHA!" No.

If those kids were stupid enough for their age to try that, well, what can you say? It's their fault. We fans didn't do anything, so for you to say we should be ashamed for liking Naruto is wholly unfair. And really, 'Died at our hands'? Come on, if you're going to try to insult people, make sure it makes sense. How could he die at our hands? We weren't the ones who buried him. We weren't the ones who didn't bother to realize that when something covers your head completely and there are no holes, you run out of air. Direct your anger at those who deserve it, not those who had virtually nothing to do with it.

Shut up.

First off the kid is a retard. It was the kids and parents fault, not narutos. They should not ruin it for all the intellegant people who know not to stick there head in a sand box.

Second off The news people got the plot wrong. And there information was incorrect.


Also naruto is not getting cancelled. Read up a little more on your facts. And we didnt kill the kid, The sandbox did =p

ANIME IS NOT TO BLAME!!! SOME RETARD WENT AND DID IT. HAHAHHAAH. OK, IF SOMEONE WANTED TO BE LIKE SUPERMAN AND TRY TO JUMP OFF A BUILDING, AND THEY DIED, WOULD THEY CUT OFF SUPERMAN??? NO. ANIME IS NOT TO BLAME. SORRY TO TELL YOU THIS PEOPLE, BUT THERES SO MANY RETARTED KIDS OUT THERE.



The answer content post by the user, if contains the copyright content please contact us, we will immediately remove it.
Copyright © 2007 enter-qa.com -   Contact us

Entertainment Categories