Why do you think that Yahoo! has considered Horoscopes to fall under Entertainme!

Why do you think that Yahoo! has considered Horoscopes to fall under Entertainment?

Wouldn't Society & Culture be more appropriate?
Or Arts & Humanities?
Or how about Social Science, right next to Dream Interpretation?

What do you all think?

2 months ago
I'm really surprised the top contributors are so lame. Top of the **** is about all. No real thought put into those answers. Keep up the top contributions.

2 months ago
An answer like OMG...'s that is well written, answers the question at hand, and is devoid of personal opinion is likely to win best answer.

2 months ago
No far, I think I like the answer "mhiaa" provided. "OMG..." still has directly answered the question the best. "airm8rix" came close to achieving good marks, but stated that "entertainment value is all you get from a horoscope".

I dare all of the people claiming there is no scientific evidence of Horoscope accuracy to put that to a scientific test before making the statement again. If what they believe is true, then Horoscopes should be falsifiable, and they are not, ergo, there must be some degree of accuracy that can be obtained from them. I know, I have a scientific, objective mind.

From what I've seen, researched, been told, it's because they're afraid of lawsuits, etc. Many have wanted a pro section; real astrolgy, and not the: will an Aries and a Leo fall in love happily ever after type stuff. I agree with ya. There should be horoscopes for entertainment, and a separate section for astrologers/astrology.