Do you think astrologers' beliefs about signs characteristics are complicate!


Question: Signs (Taurus, Gemini) are broadly agreed upon by astrologers to have certain characteristics such as hard working, calm, whimsical (some are had by more than one sign), etc.

You assume there are exceptions to the what is broadly agreed upon by astrologers. Generalizations aren't specific, but, they can be good approximations. It doesn't snow in Florida (that may be beyond generalization)......

Do you believe astrologers are correct about their broad assumptions about signs?
The gemini is "versatile, whimsical, nimble, articulate, active, kind, adaptable" Why?

Especially, those that don't overlap.
Sagittarius is agreed "broadly" to be ardent. Scorpio is agreed "broadly" to be magnetic.

Do astrologers really believe this? If they see a scorpio, the scorpio will more often be magnetic than a sagittarius and a sagittarius will more often be ardent?
It seems crazy to me.


Answers: Signs (Taurus, Gemini) are broadly agreed upon by astrologers to have certain characteristics such as hard working, calm, whimsical (some are had by more than one sign), etc.

You assume there are exceptions to the what is broadly agreed upon by astrologers. Generalizations aren't specific, but, they can be good approximations. It doesn't snow in Florida (that may be beyond generalization)......

Do you believe astrologers are correct about their broad assumptions about signs?
The gemini is "versatile, whimsical, nimble, articulate, active, kind, adaptable" Why?

Especially, those that don't overlap.
Sagittarius is agreed "broadly" to be ardent. Scorpio is agreed "broadly" to be magnetic.

Do astrologers really believe this? If they see a scorpio, the scorpio will more often be magnetic than a sagittarius and a sagittarius will more often be ardent?
It seems crazy to me.

what you're talking about is the simplest level of astrology, the sun astrology. however, there are many planets, houses, aspects which must all be taken into account in order for you to have a complete chart... my description of aquarius alone wouldn't make any sense, unless you had my rising sign and moon sign, because i don't act like the average aquarius. i'm assuming that astrologers would really believe whatever the chart tells them, because the chart matters most in readings.

Yes but ive seen ppl stay true to their descriptions too... I have the Book of Birthdays and some others and theyre good..

I believe people have certain charateristics about them due to their star. I also believe Sciencists believe it true. In bible history man has worshiped the stars, because they believed they had a certain power over a person. They made idols to the sun god,so astrologers must believe in it, as the worship of it progressed thru the centuries. But any one with any bible knowledge would tell you its wrong to use astrology signs for telling your future. God disagree with it. Thats all that matters.

I believe that astrologers are correct on what they preach because if you really take the time to study what they say about each sign you will come to the conclusion that they are right. I am getting really good at it now that i can just see someone and how they act and then guess their sign and get it right.

thats because you dont fully understand astrology.

we have 12 planets and theres also 12 houses, all could be in different signs. they also interact with each planet differently.

and you thought just because your born in the month of that zodiac, and thats it.

Astrology likes to label, pigeon-hole and stereotype with no evidence to back it up. Also with so many exceptions to it own rules, why even bother to have rules.



The answer content post by the user, if contains the copyright content please contact us, we will immediately remove it.
Copyright © 2007 enter-qa.com -   Contact us

Entertainment Categories