Miley Cyrus photos!?!
Question: Miley Cyrus photos!!?
I just want to know why vanity fair and possibley her parents aren't being charged with child endangerment and pornography!?!?!?!? That girl is ONLY 15,so what the hell makes it o!.k!. for any one to take nude photos of this child!? Whether she is covered or not,they are still of a sexual nature! If she was any other 15year old that wasn't famous and these pictures were taken,then it would be called CHILD PORNAGRAPHY! So,why is this any different!?Www@Enter-QA@Com
Answers:
I think she is a kid, and kids do dumb things!. They don't always think of the consequences!. That's what parents are for, to keep their kids from doing stupied things(as much as possible at least)I would imagine being surrounded by adults all telling her they were "great photos" made it hard to disagree!. And one of those adults was a famous photographer, which could be intimidating to anyone!. After all they are supposed to "know best" right!? I would like to know on what planet her parents and other responsible adults thought those photos would be ok!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
i look at it this way!.!.!.
vanity fair is an ADULT magazine!. miley's fan base should not be reading this magazine at all!. so it's not like they would have seen the pictures had this story not caused a huge ruckus!. besides that, i don't understand why her parents would leave her at the shoot by herself for the last shot!. that doesn't make sense to me!.
vanity fair and her parents ARE NOT being charged with child pornography!. that's ludicrous!. she didn't even show any "vitals" if you know what i meanWww@Enter-QA@Com
vanity fair is an ADULT magazine!. miley's fan base should not be reading this magazine at all!. so it's not like they would have seen the pictures had this story not caused a huge ruckus!. besides that, i don't understand why her parents would leave her at the shoot by herself for the last shot!. that doesn't make sense to me!.
vanity fair and her parents ARE NOT being charged with child pornography!. that's ludicrous!. she didn't even show any "vitals" if you know what i meanWww@Enter-QA@Com
i know i agree w/ u all the way! she was wearing a strapless bra and wrapped some fabric around her to make it look like a bed cover!. and i was reading on aol that annie leibovitz took the pictures and thats the same woman who took pics of the nude preggo demi moore!. i also dont understand why miley's hair was messed up to look like she jus woke up from having sex in bed!. thats exactly what the photos looked like to me!. and the pics of her and her dad were very disturbing!. ughWww@Enter-QA@Com
i'm soo with u all the way!! 1!. thats an adult magizine that none of her fans should be reading and shouldn't read and 2!. she's too young to be doing photos like that!. now that i think of it noone should do photos like thatWww@Enter-QA@Com
HAVE YOU SEEN THE PICTURE!?!!?!!? she is not naked!. you can see her back and shoulders!. the rest is covered by a sheet!. PEOPLE NEED TO GET A LIFE!!!Www@Enter-QA@Com