Can u summarize the movie of 12 angry man????!
Question: Can u summarize the movie of 12 angry man!?!?!?!?
THIS IS THE MOVIE 12 ANGRY MAN BY SIDNEY LUMETWww@Enter-QA@Com
Answers:
The story begins after closing arguments have been presented in a murder case, as the judge is giving his instructions to the jury!. According to American law at the time, any jury that will decide whether the death penalty is appropriate must be unanimous!. The question they are deciding is whether the defendant, a young boy from the city slum in his young teenage years, murdered his father!. The jury is further instructed that a guilty verdict will be accompanied by a mandatory death sentence — the electric chair!. The jury of twelve move to the jury room, where they begin to become acquainted with each others' personalities and discuss the case!.
The plot of the film revolves around their difficulty in reaching a unanimous verdict due, in some cases, to the jurors' prejudices!. Juror #8 dissents in the initial voting, stating that the evidence presented is circumstantial and the boy deserves a fair deliberation, upon which he starts questioning the accuracy and reliability of the sole two witnesses to the murder, the fact that the knife used in the murder is not as unique as assumed (he produces an identical one from his pocket) and that the overall circumstances are rather shady!.
His most fierce opponents - Jurors 3, 4 and 10 - claim that the boy's alibi is blotched, since he does not remember any detail from the movies he watched at the theatre the night of the murder and he has sufficient motivation to kill his father!. His lack of memory, however, is excused by panic attack; also, one of the witnesses is accused of wanting attention whilst the other might have "witnessed" the murder without her glasses on!. As the deliberation goes on, the jurors go on to vote not guilty - in order, Jurors 9, 5, 2, 11, 6, 7, 12, 1, 4, 10 and finally 3!. Juror 8 makes up his mind at the very beginning, in a secret vote; after hearing his reasons and listening to the complaints of Jurors 7 and 10, Jurors 5 and 2 change their votes!. After Jurors 11 and 6 also decide on "not guilty," 7 becomes tired and also votes "not guilty" just so that the deliberation may end!. Juror 12 changes his mind after voting "not guilty," but switches back moments after; the jury Foreman, 1, also votes "not guilty"!. Juror 10 loses all favor or respect after indulging in a bigoted rant, after which he is told to "shut up" by Juror 4 - who in turn is convinced that the witness who "saw" the murder may be inaccurate in her account owing to the fact that she may not have been wearing glasses at the time!.
Last of all is the adamant Juror 3, who, after a long confrontation with Juror 8, breaks down after glancing at and furiously tearing up a picture of him and his son, whom he hasn't seen in two years (his angry rage suggesting a probable falling out with the boy)!. All jurors leave and clear the accused of all charges off-screen!. In the epilogue, the friendly Jurors 8 and 9 exchange surnames (all jurors have remained nameless throughout the movie) and the movie ends!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
The plot of the film revolves around their difficulty in reaching a unanimous verdict due, in some cases, to the jurors' prejudices!. Juror #8 dissents in the initial voting, stating that the evidence presented is circumstantial and the boy deserves a fair deliberation, upon which he starts questioning the accuracy and reliability of the sole two witnesses to the murder, the fact that the knife used in the murder is not as unique as assumed (he produces an identical one from his pocket) and that the overall circumstances are rather shady!.
His most fierce opponents - Jurors 3, 4 and 10 - claim that the boy's alibi is blotched, since he does not remember any detail from the movies he watched at the theatre the night of the murder and he has sufficient motivation to kill his father!. His lack of memory, however, is excused by panic attack; also, one of the witnesses is accused of wanting attention whilst the other might have "witnessed" the murder without her glasses on!. As the deliberation goes on, the jurors go on to vote not guilty - in order, Jurors 9, 5, 2, 11, 6, 7, 12, 1, 4, 10 and finally 3!. Juror 8 makes up his mind at the very beginning, in a secret vote; after hearing his reasons and listening to the complaints of Jurors 7 and 10, Jurors 5 and 2 change their votes!. After Jurors 11 and 6 also decide on "not guilty," 7 becomes tired and also votes "not guilty" just so that the deliberation may end!. Juror 12 changes his mind after voting "not guilty," but switches back moments after; the jury Foreman, 1, also votes "not guilty"!. Juror 10 loses all favor or respect after indulging in a bigoted rant, after which he is told to "shut up" by Juror 4 - who in turn is convinced that the witness who "saw" the murder may be inaccurate in her account owing to the fact that she may not have been wearing glasses at the time!.
Last of all is the adamant Juror 3, who, after a long confrontation with Juror 8, breaks down after glancing at and furiously tearing up a picture of him and his son, whom he hasn't seen in two years (his angry rage suggesting a probable falling out with the boy)!. All jurors leave and clear the accused of all charges off-screen!. In the epilogue, the friendly Jurors 8 and 9 exchange surnames (all jurors have remained nameless throughout the movie) and the movie ends!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
The film is centered around twelve jurors who are deliberating!. At the start of the film, most are ready to find the young, Hispanic defendant guilty of murder!. However, one juror wishes to be thorough and starts to review all of the evidence!. For example, the knife that the prosecution claimed was rare and thus linked the boy to the crime can in fact be purchased readily!. This one juror slowly convinces the other jurors that there is a reasonable doubt that the boy committed the murder and thus a non-guilty verdict is rendered!.Www@Enter-QA@Com