Confusing Ending of "Hard Candy"?!
Question: Confusing Ending of "Hard Candy"!?
Look at the bottom here for my question!.
--------------------------------------!.!.!.
I recently saw the movie "Hard Candy" on Showtime!. It's about this photographer (Jeff) who meets a 14-year-old girl (Hayley) online!. He wants to take pictures of her, so he meets her at a coffee shop!. She invites herself over his house, then drugs him and ties him up!. She thinks h's a pedophile who murdered a recently-missing girl, but he denies it!.
She tortures him, first making him believe she'd castrated him (which she didn't), then binding him and standing him up on a chair with a noose around his neck!. She tells him if he kills himself, she'll get rid of all the evidence against him (a photo of the missing girl and a planted suicide note); otherwise she'll kill him and leave the evidence!.
He escapes, and goes after her with a knife, presumably for revenge!. He follows her up to the roof, when she tells him she'd called his long-lost love to come to the house!. She says the offer still stands: hang himself off the roof, and she'll clear away any incriminating evidence!. He denies doing anything wrong still, but knows that either way he's going to prison, so he kills himself!. Then she adds a clause to her deal: "Or not"!.
--------------------------------------!.!.!.
Now, here's my question: Was Jeff guilty or innocent!? Obviously, he'd deny everything usually, but when you're threatened with castration and still deny it, then you think you've been castrated and STILL deny it, then are about to kill yourself and STILL deny it, I tend to think you're innocent!. At the same time, there's a disturbing scene where Jeff sort of snaps as he's looking for Hayley!. Of course, Hayley comes off as a psychopath, so I don't know!.
Can anyone help clear this up!?
Thanks!.
-IMP ;) :) Www@Enter-QA@Com
--------------------------------------!.!.!.
I recently saw the movie "Hard Candy" on Showtime!. It's about this photographer (Jeff) who meets a 14-year-old girl (Hayley) online!. He wants to take pictures of her, so he meets her at a coffee shop!. She invites herself over his house, then drugs him and ties him up!. She thinks h's a pedophile who murdered a recently-missing girl, but he denies it!.
She tortures him, first making him believe she'd castrated him (which she didn't), then binding him and standing him up on a chair with a noose around his neck!. She tells him if he kills himself, she'll get rid of all the evidence against him (a photo of the missing girl and a planted suicide note); otherwise she'll kill him and leave the evidence!.
He escapes, and goes after her with a knife, presumably for revenge!. He follows her up to the roof, when she tells him she'd called his long-lost love to come to the house!. She says the offer still stands: hang himself off the roof, and she'll clear away any incriminating evidence!. He denies doing anything wrong still, but knows that either way he's going to prison, so he kills himself!. Then she adds a clause to her deal: "Or not"!.
--------------------------------------!.!.!.
Now, here's my question: Was Jeff guilty or innocent!? Obviously, he'd deny everything usually, but when you're threatened with castration and still deny it, then you think you've been castrated and STILL deny it, then are about to kill yourself and STILL deny it, I tend to think you're innocent!. At the same time, there's a disturbing scene where Jeff sort of snaps as he's looking for Hayley!. Of course, Hayley comes off as a psychopath, so I don't know!.
Can anyone help clear this up!?
Thanks!.
-IMP ;) :) Www@Enter-QA@Com
Answers:
jeff admitted to hayley that he was there when the other girl was killed, and he'll tell her his name of the guy who was with him when it happened, to which hayley answered "i already know his name, and before he died, he told me you killed her"!.
after he jumped of the roof, she indicated she wasn't gonna hide the child porn, and the red hoodie she's wearing is supposed to have a "little red riding hood" significance!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
after he jumped of the roof, she indicated she wasn't gonna hide the child porn, and the red hoodie she's wearing is supposed to have a "little red riding hood" significance!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
Yes he was guilty, there was too much evidence of what he had done!. It clearly sums it up in the end!. When he has the rope around his neck the deal was that if he hangs himself Hailey wouldn't tell his girlfriend of what he did and therefore be saved!. Thus stating that he was guilty!. And yes she was still a psychopath Www@Enter-QA@Com
think about it! why did he wanna meet up with a 14 year old and take her back to his house in the first place!?!?!?!? thats kinda fishy right!? the whole online younger girl/older guy thing (my personal thoughts on the matter are as follows!.!.!.!.!.!.*massive amounts of gagging noises!!!*)he just got what was commin to him i guess!. like that show that exposes guys like taht!.!.!.!.only he almost got castrated then killed himself!.
btw this 14 year old girl in question is kinda creepy herself for SPEAKING to an older man online and inviting herself back to his house!. she was askin for it!.!.!.!.she's lucky she didnt get raped or murdered honestly
very great question man! Star!Www@Enter-QA@Com
btw this 14 year old girl in question is kinda creepy herself for SPEAKING to an older man online and inviting herself back to his house!. she was askin for it!.!.!.!.she's lucky she didnt get raped or murdered honestly
very great question man! Star!Www@Enter-QA@Com