Who agrees that The Lion King II was actually a good Disney sequel?!
Question: Who agrees that The Lion King II was actually a good Disney sequel!?
Answers:
it was freaking awesome but i still don't understand why their had to be a 1 and 1/2 i mean i like timon and pumbaa but the Lion King is about lions not warthogs and meerkatsWww@Enter-QA@Com
as far as keeping with the ORIGINAL Disney-ness, it was pretty good!. as of late, the newer Disney movies have been lacking!. then again, i grew up in the Aladdin-Beauty and the Beast-Little Mermaid time and its hard to reproduce stuff like that!. it was good because it was a lot like the first story plot wise (but without Jeremy Irons as Scar it lacks in appeal a bit :) )Www@Enter-QA@Com
I thought it was very good!. Don't expect the original, but it was SO much better than so many Disney sequels!. Di you ever see the sequel to the delightful "Tarzan!?" What a stinker that was!Www@Enter-QA@Com
eh, it was okay, however I liked you better as a genie in the sequel of Aladdin better!.
Lion King was better, Lion King 1 1/2 Timon and Pumbas story was down right funny!Www@Enter-QA@Com
Lion King was better, Lion King 1 1/2 Timon and Pumbas story was down right funny!Www@Enter-QA@Com
It was good, i used to love it when i was little!.
I thought Lion King 1/2 was stupid, and boring!.
Although!.!.Toy Story 2 was good too!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
I thought Lion King 1/2 was stupid, and boring!.
Although!.!.Toy Story 2 was good too!.Www@Enter-QA@Com
i liked it, although disney has gotten better about sequels lately!. Look at pirates they were both good sequelsWww@Enter-QA@Com
It was alright, 3rd was just weird!. Www@Enter-QA@Com