Shouldn't it have been "Hit the Road, Jack, and don't you come back!
Question: I know Ray was blind, but that's no excuse for bad grammar.
Answers: I know Ray was blind, but that's no excuse for bad grammar.
what you say???? Now baby listen baby don't treat Ray so mean, you're the meanest old soda I've ever seen.
No.
Just no.
no more sounds better dude
sing it out and ud agree with me
that is a horrible question. now really ask yourself, which one sounds better?
ya..urs makes a lot more sense
Yep we should go through all songs an preform a grammar check.
*sarcasm*
not all songs have perfect grammar
yes that would be the correct grammer
No it sounds stupid that way.
no...
"Don't you come back no more" is way better.
nope
Ba-zing!
Another laugh brought to you by Bill the Spite Guy!
(To answer your question...yes, it probably should, but it wouldn't be NEARLY as fun to sing, though)
haha
no...no more was perfect for the song
sometimes bad grammar gives emotions oomph plus it worked better for the cadence of the song.
No!!
It's street talk!
Ain't you got not sense?!
Bad grammer makes better songs. Ray had it right!!!!
uhh. don't analyze things that much!! it just sounds better with "no" any more any more any more just sounds. strangee... :(
Granted, but it just doesn't roll off the tongue when you say it like that.
But it sounds soooo cool!
Blindness is no excuse for bad gramme!
sho nuff~!!!
Tell me what (do) I say? Nope, just not right, sorry.
Did you also notice they used a Roosevelt dime in Titanic? Let's not over examine and over analyze, sugar. Have yourself some fun, tell me "Dawna, don't you answer my questions no more!"
To which I'll reply: "Whatchoo say?"
Yep. You're right. But if we're going to do that, then we'd end up ruining a lot of cool songs.
Rolling Stones: "I Can't Get Any Satisfaction."
Beatles: "I Have To Get You Into My life"
And so on.
Sometimes, a little informal grammar sounds more natural.
True, but then it would not sound like Ray, would it?