Ashes to Ashes or Life on Mars ...?!


Question: ... tricky.... Gene Hunt was awesome in both....

Answers: ... tricky.... Gene Hunt was awesome in both....
Life on Mars was *miles* better.

Ashes was ok but last nights episode kind of blew my theory of what was going to happen which is waaay too long to go in to right now!!

They are filming series 2 in August, hopefully it'll be more enjoyable - and it won't have any flippin' clowns!
life on mars was alot better Report It
?mega's Avatar ?mega
The clown was important - it was David Bowie's personna in the 80s Report It

Other Answers (5)

="shown">
  • Caveman Dave's Avatar by Caveman Dave
    Member since:
    September 18, 2007
    Total points:
    1131 (Level 3)
    ="network">
  • Add to My Contacts
  • Block User
    • Life on Mars was Far better.

    Ashes was ok and entertaining but I thought it would have had a better ending.

    I thought bolly knickers would have got back to the present time (does that make sense) but they left it open for another series.

    It's a pity Sam Tyler wasn't in it,
    I know he is supposed to be dead but i think his body wasn't found. Maybe next series.
    Life on Mars deffo, the guy who played Sam Tyler was gorgeous!
    Life on Mars.

    Brilliant, totally brilliant. Love Gene Hunt, but do have a soft spot for Sam Tyler.
    Life on mars,keeley hawse can't act
    life on mars

    he was a bit more politically correct in ashes to ashes and drank wine

    The answer content post by the user, if contains the copyright content please contact us, we will immediately remove it.
    Copyright © 2007 enter-qa.com -   Contact us